My attorney uses a phrase that has stayed with me: Is the juice worth the squeeze?
It is not an especially elegant phrase, but it has a way of getting to the point. Effort has a cost. So do attention, patience, money, and morale. The question is not whether something can be made to work. Given enough time and pressure, many things can. The better question is whether the return still justifies what is being consumed along the way.
Photography offers plenty of opportunities to forget that.
There are images I have spent far too long trying to save. The exposure is close. The composition almost works. There is enough in the frame to keep me interested, but not enough to make the photograph whole. I adjust, revisit, crop, and convince myself that one more correction might uncover what I thought I saw when I pressed the shutter.
Sometimes it does.
More often, I am squeezing harder because I have already invested so much in the attempt.
The same question appears in other forms. A job that sits at the edge of being worthwhile. A lens that solves a very specific problem but spends most of its life in a case. A client relationship that requires more explanation, more accommodation, and more recovery than the work itself should demand.
None of these are automatically bad decisions. A rarely used lens may still earn its place. A difficult photograph may reveal something after a long struggle. A demanding client may lead to work that would not have happened otherwise.
But effort can become its own justification. Once enough time, money, or patience has been spent, walking away begins to feel like waste.
I have seen the same pattern in organizations, only at a much larger scale. A project begins with a reasonable expectation. Money is committed. People are assigned. Timelines are announced. Then the project starts to fail.
At first, the response is understandable. More resources are added. More meetings are scheduled. Leadership becomes more involved. Each new commitment is framed as the thing that will finally turn the effort around.
Instead, the project becomes harder to abandon.
Management is no longer protecting the original opportunity. It is protecting the decision to pursue it. The investment becomes evidence that the work must continue, even as the return grows less certain. What began as a business decision slowly becomes a defense of judgment, reputation, and authority.
I have watched this consume departments. Money disappears into work that no longer has a clear purpose. Capable people become exhausted trying to satisfy shifting expectations. Morale declines because everyone can see what leadership is unwilling to acknowledge.
The cost is rarely limited to the failing project. Other work is delayed. Better ideas are starved of attention. People learn that honesty carries more risk than compliance. Eventually, preserving the appearance of progress becomes more important than progress itself.
Photography can carry a quieter version of the same mistake. I can continue working on an image because I have already spent an hour on it. I can keep a client because replacing the revenue feels uncertain. I can justify a purchase because admitting it was unnecessary feels worse than allowing it to gather dust.
The scale is different, but the pattern is familiar.
Persistence is often treated as a virtue, and sometimes it is. Some of the best work requires patience, revision, and a willingness to remain with uncertainty longer than is comfortable. But persistence and escalation are not the same thing.
Persistence remains connected to possibility.
Escalation remains connected to what has already been spent.
Maybe it is because I am getting older, or simply because I am busier, but the question has begun to influence how I think. I consider commitments more carefully and spend more time looking at what they may eventually require.
As I complete my new studio, I find the dumpster filling with a lot of squeeze that produced no juice.
Leave a Reply