It was an interesting day.
I found myself talking with several people about artificial intelligence and how the phrase itself may be a bit of a sleight of hand. Not to diminish our silicon companions, but are they intelligent? Personally, I think that depends on what we mean by intelligence.
There is no question that AI appears profoundly intelligent. The amount of information available to it exceeds what any individual, or perhaps any generation of individuals, could hope to accumulate in a lifetime. Its responses are often useful, coherent, and surprisingly insightful.
Yet AI’s real strength seems to be prediction.
Given sufficient information and context, it predicts what is likely to come next. The process is probabilistic, but the results are often convincing enough that people mistake confidence for correctness.
At one point in the conversation, the phrase stochastic nonsense came up. Not as criticism, but as a description of the mechanism. Vast amounts of information, probabilities, patterns, and predictions combining to produce responses that are often meaningful and occasionally profound.
Later, I found myself thinking less about AI and more about us.
We spend our lives absorbing information. Conversations, books, successes, failures, observations, fears, and experiences accumulate without much concern for organization. Most of the time they simply sit there.
Looking back, I rarely learn in a straight line. Experiences, observations, failures, books, and conversations accumulate without any obvious structure. Then one observation, one sentence, one photograph, or one conversation causes disparate fragments to coalesce into a coherent pattern.
The insight feels sudden, but the process that produced it may have been unfolding for years.
Perhaps that is why understanding often arrives as recognition rather than discovery.
Leave a Reply